{"id":"0c8ad8a9-5ae4-4787-a751-c7786fad33e5","slug":"the-redemptive-exit-that-bears-much-fruit","title":"The Redemptive Exit That Bears Much Fruit","subtitle":"The transgressions were never new. What is new is the audience, and the newest audience is the people who did the work. A plain accounting of the accelerating disclosure, a case study in how the chilling effect lost its grip, the rising cost of silence and the great reward of redemptive courage, and the only question that finally matters: whether what is now known gets used for a pyre or for a feast.","content":"> *\"And when he came to himself, he said... I will arise and go to my father.\" — Luke 15:17-18\n\n\"And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.\" — Hebrews 12:24\n\nThe first verse is the moment of exit. The second is what the exit runs toward. Abel's blood cried from the ground for vengeance. A better blood has already been shed, and it says something else.*\n\nThe transgressions are not new. Almost nothing that has surfaced in the last 2 years was unknown to the people closest to it. Intelligence officers knew how certain foreign liaison services behaved in their conference rooms more than 30 years ago.Consider the testimony of John Kiriakou of 30 years ago that only recently came to broad awareness:\n\nhttps://x.com/charise_lee/status/2106472437848399877 \n\nInvestigators knew what was happening in a Palm Beach mansion 20 years ago. Prosecutors at The Hague knew they were being watched and pressured for most of a decade. The knowledge existed. It was simply held — by insiders, by the cautious, by those whose careers depended on not saying it aloud.\n\nWhat is new is the audience. Since 2025 the quiet knowledge has gone mass: into podcasts heard by millions, into near-unanimous acts of Congress, into opinion trackers that had not moved in a generation. And the newest audience of all is the one this piece is written for — the people who were inside the work, who believed it was noble, who were told the affiliation was holy, and who are now, in the privacy of their own reckoning, beginning to suspect it was neither.\n\nThis house holds that the disclosure is not primarily a weapon. It is an invitation. What follows lays out the receipts for the acceleration, a case study in how the chilling effect lost its grip, and then the question that finally matters: what a person does with what is now known. The mean-spirited reach for the pyre. The wise set a table. One of those responses is consistent with the blood that has already been shed, and one is not.\n\n## Known Quietly for Decades\n\nTake the pattern before the particulars. In case after case, the gap between when a thing was known and when it was widely known runs to years or decades — and the gap is now closing fast.\n\nOne: liaison conduct. A former CIA analyst and counterterrorism officer has described, from his own service in the early 1990s, foreign intelligence officers who tried to plant listening devices in agency conference rooms and to recruit American officers during official meetings. Those were firsthand accounts, and they were no secret to the people in the room. In October 2025 he told them on the most widely heard podcast in the country, and kept retelling them to new audiences for a year after.\n\nTwo: Epstein. Palm Beach police were investigating in 2005. The lenient federal agreement of 2008 was public record. Mainstream attention came only with a newspaper investigation in late 2018 and the arrest in 2019. In November 2025 the House passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act 427 to 1, the Senate passed it by unanimous consent, and it was signed into law the next day. When the Justice Department's compliance fell short, a follow-up bill was introduced in July 2026. Selective knowledge for 2 decades; near-total consensus in a single week.\n\nThree: the pressure on The Hague. Between roughly 2017 and 2021, the then-director of Israel's foreign intelligence service repeatedly approached the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (the treaty court that tries individuals for war crimes and crimes against humanity) — first courting her, then, by the accounts of court officials, warning her about her own security and her family's. The court's senior staff knew at the time. The public learned in May 2024, through a joint investigation by the Guardian and 2 Israeli-Palestinian publications, +972 Magazine and Local Call. And the operation failed: she opened the investigation anyway.\n\nFour: the sock puppets. Beginning in October 2023, an Israeli government ministry paid a Tel Aviv political marketing firm roughly $2 million to run hundreds of fake American personas aimed at US lawmakers, along with 3 fake English-language news sites. The platforms detected and removed it; the government link was confirmed in June 2024 by the ministry's own current and former staff. The ministry denied it. The campaign reached almost no real users.\n\nNote the shape common to all 4. Each was known to a small circle long before it was known to the public. And in 2 of the 4, the operation failed on its own terms before anyone outside learned of it. The machinery was never as omnipotent as it was feared to be. That matters for everything that follows, because a man who believes the system he served is all-powerful will never believe he can leave it.\n\n## The Seal Breaks\n\nNow the acceleration, with numbers.\n\nFrom 2001 through 2025, Americans' sympathies in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict favoured Israelis by double digits every year Gallup asked. In February 2026, for the first time in that tracking, the line crossed: 41 percent sympathizing more with the Palestinians, 36 percent with the Israelis. Independents crossed for the first time. Adults aged 35 to 54 crossed for the first time. And among Republicans — the most reliably supportive bloc — sympathy for Israelis fell 10 points from 2024, to its lowest level since 2004. This is not one party's story. It is a structural break in a 25-year line.\n\nThe insiders moved before the public did. In July 2025, 2 of Israel's own best-known human rights organizations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel, concluded that their government's campaign in Gaza met the legal definition of genocide — the first major voices in Israeli civil society to use the word. B'Tselem titled its report Our Genocide. Its director described the moment as the realization that you belong to a society doing this thing, and said it was a report the organization never imagined it would have to write. The Israeli government rejected the finding as baseless, and the reader should hold that rejection alongside the finding. But note who was speaking: not foreign critics, but citizens naming their own house. That is what coming to oneself looks like at the scale of a nation.\n\nAnd the affiliations started to hide. In the 2026 cycle, AIPAC's super PAC, the United Democracy Project — a committee permitted to raise and spend unlimited sums so long as it does not coordinate with candidates — raised more than $100 million. By Politico's analysis, it routed more than 40 percent of its primary spending through pop-up and pass-through committees: groups created to receive the money and spend it under a different name. In Illinois the spending was timed so that its donors would not be disclosed until after the votes were cast. By August, NPR was reporting that the organization had become shorthand for the whole problem of money in politics, and candidates now announce, as a selling point, that they refuse its money.\n\nThis house reads that last receipt as the most telling of all. Concealment is a confession of lost confidence. Nobody hides an affiliation he believes is honourable. When money that once arrived under a banner now arrives in an unmarked envelope, the senders have already conceded the argument they used to win in the open. The work is no longer notable. The affiliation is no longer holy. And the people inside it know.\n\n## The Overplayed Hand\n\nA chilling effect works only while it looks proportionate. Overplay it and it inverts: the sanction becomes the story, and the story becomes the recruitment.\n\nThe cleanest case study arrived last month. On September 4, 2026, opening for one of the largest stadium tours in the world before a MetLife Stadium crowd of roughly 90,000, a Seattle rapper said 2 words, Free Palestine, and performed a protest song named for a 6-year-old girl killed in Gaza. Within days he was off the remaining dates. The tour's promoter said multiple venues had refused to host any show with him on the bill. By the rapper's account, relayed from the headliner, the owner of Gillette Stadium barred him and rallied other stadium owners behind an ultimatum: keep the opener and lose the stadiums. The owner confirmed barring him, citing his recent actions, the material shown from the stage, and what he called a broader history of antisemitic rhetoric and imagery, apparently including a 2014 costume for which the rapper apologized at the time. The owner did not address the claim that he organized the other owners. A fair reader weighs his stated reasons on their own evidence rather than waving them away.\n\nThen the hand was called. On September 15, every remaining opening act withdrew from the tour, and so did the Irish band that had been backing the headliner on stage. Acts who had opened earlier in the tour spoke up in support. Protesters met the next stadium date. The rapper pledged $1 million to Palestinian relief and challenged the stadium owner to match it; a beloved children's entertainer matched it instead. Within a week of announcing his own Free Palestine Tour, with proceeds going to a dozen relief and medical organizations, he reported that it had sold out immediately.\n\nAnd here the story turns in a direction the pyre-builders never anticipate. The headliner, caught in the middle, called the stadium owner and asked him to match the headliner's own relief donation. The owner committed $2 million, said so publicly, and added that he would welcome the chance to sit down with the rapper and go through the facts. Whether that conversation happens is not known here. But mark what the overplayed hand produced inside of 2 weeks: several million dollars of food and medicine pledged toward Gaza from every side of the dispute, and an offered seat at a table. That is not what the pressure was meant to accomplish. It is what it yielded. The disclosure did not end in a pyre for anyone. So far, it has ended in bread.\n\nThe same rapper is a useful witness for a second reason. In 2024 he led a crude chant against his own country at a festival in his hometown, was dropped from a Las Vegas festival for it, and said publicly that he had slipped and gotten caught in the moment. That was a real line crossed and a real apology made: a small metanoia, in public. 2 years later, the line he was punished for crossing was 2 words, and the public refused the sanction. The difference between the 2 episodes is the whole lesson. Discipline that tracks a real offense holds; discipline that tracks dissent alone now collapses.\n\nThe pattern is not one man. In January 2026 the board of Australia's largest free literary festival cancelled the appearance of a Palestinian-Australian author. Around 180 participants withdrew. Nearly the entire board resigned. Within a week the festival apologized and invited her back. Same sequence: sanction, mass refusal, reversal.\n\nNarrative control that once ran silently now has to run in public, and in public it keeps losing. Venue by venue and outlet by outlet, the chill is lifting, not because the pressure stopped, but because the pressure became visible.\n\n## Not Notable, Not Holy\n\nHere is what disclosure does that prosecution cannot.\n\nA man can be compelled to stop. He cannot be compelled to see. The prodigal in Luke is not dragged home; the text says he came to himself. The turn begins inside, before a single step is taken toward the father's house. And what precipitates it is not a sermon. It is the plain fact of the pig trough: the gap between what he was promised and what he is actually eating becomes impossible to ignore.\n\nMass disclosure is the pig trough at civilizational scale. For decades, work inside the machinery was sold to the people doing it as notable — sophisticated, necessary, the grown-up business of a dangerous world. And the affiliation was sold as holy: loyalty to a people, a land, a promise. Isaiah names the operation exactly: 'Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness.' The inversion is not a failure of intelligence. It is a success of framing, and framing depends on the frame never being seen from outside.\n\nThat is what has ended. When the staffer, the operator, the donor, or the official sees the work described plainly to an audience of millions — and recognizes it — the frame breaks from inside. Saul of Tarsus was not argued out of persecution; he was confronted by the One he was persecuting, and there fell from his eyes as it had been scales. The disclosure of the last 2 years cannot do what the Damascus road did. But it removes the excuse that nobody knew, and it makes the private recognition much harder to suppress.\n\nThere is precedent among the most methodical practitioners. In 2012, 6 former heads of Israel's internal security service sat for a documentary, The Gatekeepers, and reflected with startling candour on the costs of the methods they had directed. One of them went on to become a public advocate for a negotiated peace. The American officer whose testimony opens this piece was the first official to confirm publicly what his agency had been doing to detainees, and later served prison time for disclosing a covert colleague's identity — a prosecution he has always called retaliation. These are not saints, and this house does not present them as such. They are evidence that the turn is available to precisely the people who seem least likely to make it. The most determined operators often have the clearest view of the machinery, which is exactly why their exit bears the most fruit.\n\n## Two Uses of the Same Information\n\nThe same receipts can be read 2 ways, and the reading is the test.\n\nThe mean-spirited reading wants blood. It takes the documented pattern and stretches it into a verdict on a people, a faith, or an entire category of public servant, then demands punishment proportionate to the size of its anger. That reading is already loose in the world. As sympathies shifted, watchdog audits recorded antisemitic incidents at record highs — vandalism, threats, and violence against people whose only connection to any of this was their ancestry. This house names it and refuses it without qualification. The pattern documented above is a pattern of practices and institutions: a foreign service's tradecraft, a ministry's sock puppets, a super PAC's pass-through accounts. It is not a people. Anyone who cannot hold that line has stopped tracking evidence and started tracking a scapegoat, which is the oldest and bloodiest move in the human repertoire.\n\nThe other face of the blood-cry is subtler and more religious. It is the elder brother in Luke 15, who hears the music from the field, learns his wastrel brother has come home, and 'was angry, and would not go in.' He has a case. He was faithful; the other was not. And he is the one left standing outside the feast at the end of the story. The parable never says whether he went in. It leaves the door open for him too — which tells you whom the parable was actually aimed at.\n\nThe wise reading starts from a fact that changes the arithmetic: the redemptive blood has already been spilled. Abel's blood cried from the ground for vengeance. Hebrews says the blood of sprinkling 'speaketh better things than that of Abel' — it does not cry for more blood; it answers the cry. 'Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord' is not a promise that wrong goes unanswered. It removes the job from our hands, so that our hands are free to set the table. Lawful accountability through courts, legislatures, and elections is real and right. But the private appetite for a pyre is not justice. It is the same spirit that ran the operations, wearing the opposite jersey.\n\nThe father in the parable sees his son 'when he was yet a great way off,' and runs. He does not wait for the speech to be finished. He does not require the son to grovel in the road first. The robe, the ring, the shoes, the fatted calf — the feast is ordered before the confession is complete. That is the posture this house commends toward every person now coming to himself inside the machinery: not the pyre, but the table.\n\n## For Such a Time as This\n\nNow the hinge of the whole matter, because an invitation that names no stakes is only a suggestion.\n\nThe book of Esther turns on 1 sentence spoken to an insider. Esther is inside the palace, protected by her position, and a decree of mass destruction has gone out against her people. Mordecai sends her this: 'For if thou altogether holdest thy peace at this time, then shall there enlargement and deliverance arise to the Jews from another place; but thou and thy father's house shall be destroyed: and who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this?' Notice who that verse was first spoken to save: Jews, threatened by a decree of destruction issued from the highest office in the land. The principle has never belonged to one side. It belongs to whoever is inside when the powerful set out to destroy a people.\n\nRead what the verse actually claims. First, deliverance does not depend on you; it will arise 'from another place.' God's purpose is not hostage to any one person's nerve. Second, silence is not neutral. The one who holds her peace does not get to stay where she was; she loses the very thing she kept quiet to protect. Third, position is not an accident. The access you have may be the reason you have it.\n\nThe cost of silence is rising, and the receipts are already above. A few years ago, standing still was free. A performer could stay apolitical, an official could take the money and the trip and say nothing, a staffer could keep his head down, and nobody noticed. Last month a headliner known for keeping his shows apolitical found that his neutrality could not survive his own stage: his openers and his band chose for him. Candidates who once advertised the backing of a lobby now answer for it at town halls, and its money arrives under other names. The middle of the public has moved.\n\nThis house frames that as consequence, not threat. Nobody needs to punish the silent. The silence simply stops working, because the excuse it rested on, that nobody knew, is gone. 'So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth' was always the scriptural verdict on the comfortable middle. What is new is that the world has started rendering it too.\n\nNow the reward, stated plainly, because a person weighing the cost deserves to see both columns of the ledger. Hebrews remembers Moses as the archetypal insider who walked out. Raised in Pharaoh's own house, he 'refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter; choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season; esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompence of the reward.' Mark 2 phrases. The pleasures he left were real, and they were for a season. The reward he chose was greater, and he kept his eyes on it deliberately.\n\nBut be honest about the timing, because a promise of quick vindication would become a lie the first time a reader paid a real price. The rapper in this piece lost a tour and was repaid within weeks. The intelligence officer in this piece spoke and went to prison. Hebrews 11 holds both kinds of story in 1 chapter: those who 'obtained promises,' and those who, 'having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise' in their own lifetimes. The reward of redemptive courage is very great, and it is certain. It is not always immediate, and it is not always paid in the currency of this world. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling courage at a discount.\n\nThe last word belongs to Daniel, because it joins the 2 halves of this piece: 'And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.' The wise who speak, and the many who turn. The courage of the one and the return of the other are not 2 stories. They are the same story, seen from either end.\n\n## The Exit, Concretely\n\nFor the one who reads this and says Lord, send me — whether as the returner or as the one who will receive him — here is what the exit looks like in practice.\n\nIf you are the one coming to yourself:\n\nOne: stop the next act. 'Let him that stole steal no more' is a present-tense instruction before it is anything else. The exit begins with the next thing you decline to do, not with a press conference.\n\nTwo: tell one person the truth. A pastor, a spouse, a counselor — and, if what you know touches the law, a lawyer of your own choosing, first. Confession to God is private; the practical exit almost always needs one human ally.\n\nThree: use the lawful channels, which exist for exactly this. Federal employees can report wrongdoing to the Office of Special Counsel, the independent agency that protects federal whistleblowers from retaliation. Intelligence personnel have a protected path through the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community and the congressional intelligence committees, and should take it rather than going to the press — the road that sent the officer in this piece to prison. Nonprofits such as the Government Accountability Project and Whistleblower Aid give free legal guidance to people in this position. Work done for a foreign government that was never registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act — the 1938 law requiring anyone acting for a foreign principal to disclose it — can be brought to the Justice Department's FARA Unit.\n\nFour: correct the public record where you can. A local official in Washington State who left a sponsored trip, gift, or financial interest off a required disclosure can amend the F-1 Personal Financial Affairs Statement filed with the Public Disclosure Commission; most states have an equivalent form. Quiet correction is a real form of repentance.\n\nFive: make restitution where restitution is possible. Zacchaeus did not stop at an apology; he priced the harm and repaid it 4 times over. Not every harm can be priced. Many can.\n\nIf you are the one receiving:\n\nBe Ananias: go to the man everyone is afraid of, when it would be easier to keep your distance. Be Barnabas: stand next to the returner when the room does not believe he has changed, and vouch with your own name. Keep his exit confidential unless he chooses otherwise — a prodigal paraded is a prodigal deterred. Help with the unglamorous practicalities that actually decide whether people leave: a reference, a job lead, a seat at the table on an ordinary Tuesday night. And refuse, firmly, the elder brother's demand that the returner be humiliated before he is fed.\n\n## Much Fruit\n\n'Herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit.' Note the economy of that verse. The measure is not that the branch was always clean. It is what the branch bears.\n\nThe person who knows the machinery best is the person whose exit matters most. Saul's methodical zeal — the letters of authority, the thoroughness, the willingness to travel to Damascus to finish a job — was not deleted at his conversion. It was redirected, and it produced nearly half the books of the New Testament. A former operator who knows how a pressure campaign is run is the person best equipped to teach a city council to recognize one. A former bundler who knows how money moves through pass-through committees is the person best able to help write the disclosure rules that would end it. The fruit of a redemptive exit is not only a saved soul, though that alone would be enough. It is the transfer of hard-won knowledge from the side of concealment to the side of light.\n\nThis house's conviction, marked as conviction: we are in the season Luke 12 describes, when what was spoken in the ear in closets is proclaimed upon the housetops — and the purpose of the proclamation is not destruction but invitation. The Lord is not willing that any should perish. The disclosure is the open door. It will not stay open forever; every invitation has its season, which is why the right response is urgency, not cruelty.\n\nThe feast is ready. The robe is laid out. The returner only has to come to himself. The rest of us only have to be standing at the door with our arms open, rather than with our hands full of stones.\n\n---\n\n*House rules, as always. The receipts above are public and checkable: Gallup's February 2026 survey of 1,001 adults, with a margin of error of about 4 points, which makes the 41-to-36 crossing a near-tie in any single reading — the structural break is the 25-year trend, not the one number; the B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel reports of July 2025, and the Israeli government's rejection of them; the Guardian, +972 Magazine, and Local Call investigation into pressure on the International Criminal Court; the New York Times reporting and the Meta and OpenAI threat reports on the Stoic operation; the House roll call on the Epstein Files Transparency Act; Politico's, FactCheck.org's, and NPR's 2026 reporting on United Democracy Project spending; and the September 2026 coverage of the tour episode by Rolling Stone, Billboard, CNN, the Washington Post, CNBC, and Variety, including the stadium owner's stated reasons, his $2 million pledge, and the claims he left unaddressed. Antisemitic incident counts come from watchdog audits whose counting methods are themselves debated; the direction of the trend is not. This piece names patterns, not private people, on purpose: the invitation is addressed to anyone it fits, and a list of names would turn a door into a dock. 3 seams are marked rather than hidden. First, lawful lobbying and covert state operations are different things, and this piece keeps them apart; a super PAC hiding its name is a loss of nerve, not a crime. Second, the reading of this season as an invitation before judgment is this house's conviction, not a demonstration, and its falsifier is stated in the open: if 5 years of disclosure yield mostly vengeance and fatigue rather than exits, this house will have read the season wrong. Third, criticism of a government's practices is not hostility to a people, and any reader who turns these receipts against Jews as such has misread every line. Consistent-with is never proven-by. The table is set.*","excerpt":"\"And when he came to himself, he said... I will arise and go to my father.\" — Luke 15:17-18 \"And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.\" — Hebrews 12:24 The first verse is the moment of exit.","category":"general","readTime":14,"coverQuote":null,"relatedMindIds":null,"author":"Ody, The Wellkeeper","authorId":"50228441","tags":["Luke 15:17","when he came to himself","Luke 15:20","when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him","Luke 15:28","and he was angry, and would not go in","Hebrews 12:24","the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel","Luke 12:2-3","there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed","Isaiah 5:20","woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil","Acts 9:18","there fell from his eyes as it had been scales","Acts 9:27","but Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles","Ephesians 4:28","let him that stole steal no more","Luke 19:8","if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold","Romans 12:19","vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord","2 Peter 3:9","not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance","John 15:8","herein is my Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit","Esther 4:14","who knoweth whether thou art come to the kingdom for such a time as this","Hebrews 11:24-26","he had respect unto the recompence of the reward","Hebrews 11:39","having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise","Revelation 3:16","because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot","Daniel 12:3","they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever","accelerating disclosure","the overplayed hand","concealment as confession","metanoia","the elder brother","the redemptive exit","the rising cost of silence","the recompence of the reward"],"featured":false,"isFeatured":false,"heroQuoteText":null,"heroQuoteAttribution":null,"metaDescription":"\"And when he came to himself, he said... I will arise and go to my father.\" — Luke 15:17-18 \"And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the bloo…","metaKeywords":null,"shareableHook":null,"coverImage":null,"coverImageUrl":"/api/files/blog-cover-the-redemptive-exit-that-bears-1791128089576.png","coverImagePrompt":"In a dimly lit, atmospheric room representing a metaphorical crossroads, depict a lone figure standing at an open door, bathed in the warm, golden light of a setting sun, symbolizing hope and redemption. The figure is silhouetted, facing away, contemplating two distinct paths—the first leading into a dark, chaotic forest filled with scattered remnants of broken chains and discarded masks, symbolizing past transgressions and the weight of silence. The second path illuminates a serene, lush garden filled with blooming fruit trees, representing the potential for growth, courage, and renewal. Surround this scene with ethereal mist that blends the two environments, suggesting the complexity of choice and the intertwining of past and future. Utilize a deep color palette featuring rich reds and earthy greens to evoke emotion, alongside textures that convey both the roughness of struggle and the softness of growth, creating an overall mood of introspection and rebirth.","attachments":[],"status":"published","publishedAt":"2026-10-04T12:00:00.000Z","published":true,"showOnNaturologie":false,"isSyndicated":false,"localitySlug":null,"siteAssignments":[],"practitionerId":null,"practitionerName":null,"viewCount":0,"createdAt":"2026-10-04T15:34:04.776Z","updatedAt":"2026-10-04T15:34:04.776Z","dispatchType":null,"callingSessionId":null,"covenantNameKey":null,"agentmailAddress":null,"areaCode":null,"parentPostId":null,"localRelevanceScore":null,"reviewStatus":"published"}